Fresh water becoming more expensive than oil

 It passes under the radar but it is more important than the end of oil reserves and more important.  Water is being used to “frack” shale to recover natural  gas and oil.  Agricultural riparian rights have made the delta of the mighty Colorado River a mud flat.  

“The Colorado River can be seen in dark blue at the topmost central part of this image. The river comes to an end just south of the multicolored patchwork of farmlands in the northwestern corner of the image and then fans out at the base of the Sierra de Juarez Mountains. A hundred years ago the river would have cut through this entire picture and plowed straight through to the Gulf of California, the mouth of which can be seen in solid blue at the lower righthand corner of the image. Nearly all the water that flows into the Colorado River is now siphoned off for use in crop irrigation and for residential use. In fact, roughly only 10 percent of all the water that flows into the Colorado makes it into Mexico and most of that is used by the Mexican people for farming.

The bluish purple river that appears to be flowing from the Gulf of California to the north is actually an inlet that formed in the bed of the Colorado River after it receded. The island at the entrance to the Gulf of California is the Isle Montague. The gray areas surrounding this inlet and the gulf itself are mud flats created by sediments once carried by the river. The Hoover Dam built in 1935 and the Glen Canyon dam built in 1956 now trap most of the river’s sediments long before they find their way to the gulf.”

The demands for water and in many cases (mining, fracking, etc) the pollution of water points to scarcity and scarce items are valuable. 

‘Shock Doctrine’ in Action: Vital Freshwater Resources Under Attack by Privatization Capitalists

“I don’t consider this an environmentalist point of view; I’m just a human who is scared shitless of the future,” says the director of the new film “Patagonia Rising.”
June 19, 2012  |
 Set in South America’s breathtaking Andes landscape, the visually sweeping new documentary Patagonia Rising bills itself as a frontier story of water and power. But both its frontier and its story nevertheless belong to anyone on the planet that needs water to live.

We are countless compared to the infinitesimal contingency who live to profit off of water. For the purposes of Patagonia Rising, screening now in New York and beyond, that includes the privatization capitalists of HidroAysen, which is planning to build five hydroelectric power plants (marketspeak for dams) to choke off Chile’s glacially fed Baker and Pascua rivers, two of the planet’s purest. Signed by President Sebastien Pinera, the first billionaire to be sworn into the Chilean presidency, but stalled thanks to vigorous protests, HidroAysen would effectively hand over almost all of Chile’s energy market to a duopoly run by Spain’s Endesa and Italy’s Enel. And they’re not exactly hiding their distaste for environmental impact of five dams cornering the prize jewel of Patagonia’s freshwater business.

 “This exploits the best use of water,” a HidroAysen executive argues in Patagonia Rising. “That’s sustainability.”

 “One of the most twisted things I learned while making Patagonia Rising is that the companies behind the building of dams in developing countries are mostly from Europe and China,” Oakland, Calif.-based director Brian Lilla told AlterNet. “Ninety percent of Chile’s water rights were sold off by Pinochet and are now controlled by Spanish and Italian energy conglomerates.”

 Naomi Klein’s indispensable The Shock Doctrine broke down that rapacious process, wherein so-called First World politicians, economists and other disaster capitalists plundered the resources and sovereignty of the Third World, using puppets like Pinochet as hammers and shovels for development and the disappeared alike. Patagonia Rising takes sobering stock of the Chilean aftermath, whose continuing political and economic instability has been exponentially problematized by global warming. A catastrophic equalizer, it will tear down whatever facades remain between disaster capitalists in America, China and Europe from the just-fine-thanks corners of the world yet to submit, paraphrasing HidroAysen’s executive, to the dream of sustainable exploitation.

 “Studies by the University of Chile and other experts have found that HidroAysén is not necessary to meet Chile’s future energy needs,” explains International Rivers regional campaign Patagonia Sin Represas. “Investment in more efficient use of electricity, together with renewable sources such as solar, geothermal and wind, would ensure a sustainable energy future.”

And it’s not just Chile that would benefit from tearing down its dams before they are built. The destructive environmental, economic and human impact of dams— from ecosphere, species and cultural extinction to seismic instability, mass relocations and cost-benefit imbalances — is precisely why domestic dams are being destroyed as you read this from Washington to Maine. In Pakistan, citizens who were uprooted in the ’70s to make way for the Bhakra dam are still awaiting rehabilitation, while the nation builds more in Lahore.

 Turkey can expect similar headaches after its proposed dams flood thousands of years of cultural history and spoil the comparatively untouched Tigris. International Rivers is further worried about fast-track megadams in South Africa, and Patagonia’s neighbor Brazil, which is quickly becoming an emergent superpower in a new century of unsustainable consumption riddled with global warming’s last-gasp resource wars.  (The complete article can be found at: )


Stay up to date with the latest Water headlines via email

About carlos

I'm a curious person, of reasonable intellect, "on the beach" (retired) and enjoying my interest in anthropology, language, civil rights, and a few other areas. I've been a hippie/student/aerospace tech writer in the '60s, a witness to the Portuguese revolution in the ‘70s, a defense test engineer and witness to the Guatemalan genocide in the '80s, and a network engineer for an ISP in the '90s. Now I’m a student and commentator until my time is up. I've spent time under the spell of the Mesoamerican pyramids and the sweet sound of the Portuguese language. I've lived in Europe, traveled in Brazil, Central America, Iceland, New Zealand, and other places. My preferred mode of travel is with a backpack and I eat (almost) anything local. Somehow, many of the countries I have been to have had civil unrest (for which I was not responsible). I'm open to correspond with anyone who might share my liberal, humanist interests. I live in San Buenaventura, California.
This entry was posted in Environment, Poli/Econ and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.